The First Quarto of Hamlet (Q1, 1603) has long been dismissed by textual scholars as a "Bad Quarto" — a corrupt, pirated, or memorially reconstructed derivative of the play, produced either by an actor recalling lines imperfectly from performance or by a stenographer transcribing the spoken text in the theatre. On this view, Q1 stands outside the line of authentic Shakespearean transmission: an approximation, a garbling, a thing contaminated at its source. This paper challenges that narrative by means of a digital facsimile of Q1 colour-coded to reveal what is here termed its bibliographical DNA. Every word in Q1 that reappears in the Second Quarto of 1604–5 with exactly the same spelling — letter for letter, in Shakespeare's own early modern orthography — is printed in green; every word shared identically with the First Folio of 1623 is printed in blue; and every word carried unchanged through both later texts is printed in gold. The result is immediate and arresting: the great majority of Q1's text is coloured, demonstrating that it shares not merely its subject matter or general phrasing, but its precise verbal substance with the two authoritative texts that followed it. This evidence is incompatible with either memorial reconstruction or stenographic transcription. The shared spellings are the fossil record of a written document, not an echo of a performance, and they point unmistakably to a common written origin: Q1 was typeset from an earlier state of the same authorial manuscript before the revision and expansion that produced the "true and perfect coppie" of Q2. The colour-coding is a work in progress: there doubtless remain words and small fragments of text not yet identified as shared with Q2 or F1, and every such identification will bring the edition closer to a complete picture of Q1's inheritance.
DAVID PIZZANELLI (Thu,) studied this question.