Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced tumor suppression in HER2-positive breast cancer using EV-mediated drug delivery, suggesting an effective therapeutic strategy.
Systemic toxicity and limited tumor selectivity remain major obstacles in HER2-positive breast cancer therapy with conventional chemotherapeutics. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) provide a promising delivery platform due to their intrinsic biocompatibility and intercellular communication. Here, we engineered EVs displaying the HER2-binding peptide P51 to create a peptide-mediated targeted delivery system for doxorubicin (Dox), aiming to enhance tumor specificity and apoptotic efficacy. EVs expressing the P51 peptide were generated by transient transfection of HEK-293 cells, followed by Dox loading to produce P51-EVDox. Cellular uptake and antitumor efficacy were evaluated in vitro and in vivo using HER2-overexpressing BT-474 breast cancer cells. RNA sequencing and apoptosis-related protein analyses, including cleaved caspase-3, PARP cleavage, and p53 expression, were performed to elucidate EV-mediated molecular mechanisms. P51-EVDox exhibited significantly enhanced binding and intracellular accumulation in HER2-positive cells compared with non-targeted EV-Dox. Transcriptomic analysis comparing free Dox and P51-EVDox revealed marked upregulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP). Consistently, protein-level analyses demonstrated increased activation of apoptosis-associated markers, including cleaved caspase-3, PARP cleavage, and p53, following P51-mediated EV delivery. These findings suggest activation of a ROS/TXNIP-driven apoptotic cascade. This study demonstrates that peptide-functionalized EVs represent a promising tumor-targeted chemotherapeutic platform for HER2-positive breast cancer. By integrating ligand-mediated cellular recognition with EV-based doxorubicin delivery, P51-EVDox activates the ROS/TXNIP signaling pathway, leading to enhanced tumor suppression and apoptosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: