Demonstrates how slice-based regularity behaves under orthogonal choices of units, indicating new insights into hypercomplex analysis.
In this paper we study a slice-based notion of regularity for the split quaternionic algebra <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">S</m:mi> </m:math> S , whose natural quadratic form has signature (2,2). For each hyperbolic unit <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mi>J</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="script">T</m:mi> </m:math> J∈ T (with J 2 = 1) we consider the slice <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>L</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>J</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">{</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>J</m:mi> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mspace width="0.17em"/> <m:mo>:</m:mo> <m:mspace width="0.17em"/> <m:mspace width="0.3333em"/> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">}</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> LJ=+Jy : x,y∈ R\ and define left s -regularity by the vanishing of the hyperbolic Cauchy–Riemann operator <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:msubsup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>D</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>J</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>*</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msubsup> </m:math> DJ^ on L J . We establish structural results that clarify how s -regularity behaves under orthogonal choices of units and how it interacts with power series on slices. In particular, we prove a splitting principle (Theorem 9) and a rigorous Abel-type boundary limit theorem for slice power series (Theorem 6), where non-tangential (Stolz-type) approach regions and an idempotent decomposition replace norm-based arguments that fail in the indefinite setting. We also provide a precise relation between the original M -approach condition and Stolz regions (Proposition 6.1) and discuss the wave/ultra-hyperbolic character of the induced second-order operators. A comparison with quaternionic slice-regularity and a brief Schur-analysis outlook position the present theory within the broader landscape of hypercomplex analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji Eun Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: