PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026The Journal of Knee Surgery0 citations

Intraoperative Tibial Periprosthetic Fractures During Total Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Early Outcomes

View Full Paper
CSChase W. SmitterbergAHAmir H. HoveidaeiRDRonald E. Delanois

Key Points

  • This study aims to summarize the incidence, mechanisms, and risk factors associated with intraoperative tibial periprosthetic fractures during total knee arthroplasty.
  • Review of intraoperative risk factors and mechanisms observed during primary and revision total knee arthroplasties.
  • Analysis of fracture occurrence during specific high-force surgical steps, focusing on keel preparation and component impaction.
  • Assessment of early outcomes related to fracture recognition and management during surgery.
  • Intraoperative tibial fractures occur in about 0.1 to 0.5% of primary total knee arthroplasties, increasing to 1.5% during revisions.
  • Fractures typically occur during keel preparation and final component impaction, with 90 to 100% of cases identified at these stages.
  • High rates of union and implant survivorship exceeding 95% reported at a mean follow-up of 6 years when fractures are recognized and managed intraoperatively.

Abstract

Abstract Intraoperative tibial periprosthetic fractures during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are uncommon, but clinically relevant complications with distinct mechanisms compared with postoperative fractures. This review summarizes the incidence, intraoperative risk factors and mechanisms, recognition, and early outcomes to provide a practical, procedure-based framework. In primary TKA, intraoperative tibial fractures occur in approximately 0.1 to 0.5% of cases, with higher rates reported in keeled tibial components and revision procedures, where incidence may approach 1.5%. These fractures occur at predictable high-force steps, most commonly during keel preparation and final component impaction, with 90 to 100% occurring at these stages across multiple series. The medial tibial plateau is particularly susceptible, and excessive insertion forces, implant size and geometry, and depth of tibial resection contribute to fracture risk. Recognition relies on intraoperative awareness of timing, tactile feedback, and subtle visual and mechanical cues. Audible cracking, sudden loss of resistance, abnormal component seating, and unexpected instability should prompt suspicion. Some fractures remain occult and are identified only on postoperative imaging, emphasizing the importance of vigilance during high-risk steps. Early outcomes are generally favorable when fractures are recognized and addressed at the time of surgery, with high rates of union and implant survivorship. Large series report survivorship free from tibial component revision exceeding 95% at up to a mean 6-year follow-up, although outcomes vary by fracture pattern. Intraoperative tibial periprosthetic fractures are predictable, mechanically driven complications that occur during specific steps of TKA. Understanding their timing, mechanisms, and presentation is essential to improve recognition and optimize outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smitterberg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080acea487c87a6a40cc37https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2865-1692
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper