Maps biphasic dose-response topology in a controlled setting, indicating critical zone dynamics.
PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm v58c Phase 1 논문 최종본 (v5.3 FINAL). 사전등록 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20150463 (v0.5 Final, 2026.05.13)4-AI Gate-0 v4.0 검수 29차 PASS (크리스, 2026.05.14) 핵심 질문:GX topology × CXZ coupling strength × epistemic depth(w)의3차원 interaction landscape를 raw로 정식 mapping하고,dynamical critical zones를 확정할 수 있는가? 주요 발견:1. Biphasic non-monotonic CXZ dose-response topology (N=40 confirmed): CXZ = 2.5×10⁻⁵ optimum pocket (x_dev_max = 0.00467, minimum), directional threshold estimate ≈ 4.4×10⁻⁵ (linear interpolation on N=40 merged AUC; noise border), high-w instability amplification ≥1.99× for CXZ = 5.0×10⁻⁵ at w ≥ 0.625. 2. GearboxZ structural independence: z_san_by_w max|Δ| = 0.00e+00 across all 6 CXZ cells × 1,260 runs (< 1×10⁻⁹ floating-point tolerance). CXZ coupling path is x-axis only; z manifold invariant. 3. w = 0.5 dynamical critical zone cross-pool replication: Phase 1-A (seeds 902–921) z_san = 0.00635, Phase 1-B (seeds 922–941) z_san = 0.00857 (1.35× amplification), ruling out single-pool artifact. 4. 3-axis Living Control N=40 ALL PASS for CXZ ≤ 5.0×10⁻⁵. CXZ ≥ 7.5×10⁻⁵: x-axis control failure confirmed. 실험 설계:- Phase 1-A: 6 cells × 7 w-points × N=20 (seeds 902–921) = 840 runs, 511.3 min- Phase 1-B: 3 cells (noise border) × 7 w-points × N=20 (seeds 922–941) = 420 runs, 257.4 min- Total: 1,260 runs, 768.7 min (~12.8 hours)- Hardware: AMD Ryzen 9 9800X3D + RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB, Windows 11- All experiments executed locally by GritMan_D.S (sole executor) Note: CXZ는 무차원 결합 계수(dimensionless coupling coefficient)이며,물리적 농도가 아닙니다. ×10⁻⁶ 표기는 색인 표기(indexical notation)입니다.Biphasic 비유는 위상 공간 구조(topology shape)의 기술적 유추이며,생화학적 메커니즘 주장이 아닙니다. 실측이 생명. 증명이 아닌 기술.— Trinity AI Research Team | Konyang University | 2026.05
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
신두섭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: