Computational modeling and machine learning have impacted several different areas of science and accelerated advancements in multiple venues. Yet traditional machine learning models have many well-known drawbacks: besides demanding a significant amount of data, they may fail to generalize beyond training data, are often treated as “black boxes”, and may predict physically inconsistent results. In response to these limitations, Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) has emerged as a new area that integrates domain knowledge, such as energy or mass conservation, directly into data-driven algorithms. This review paper examines the foundations and main strategies of PIML, organizing the approaches into three categories: automated discovery and system identification, continuous-time modeling, and operator learning. In addition, Physics-Informed Neural Networks are analyzed in a dedicated section that covers architecture fundamentals, forward and inverse problem formulations, loss function design and implementation challenges. The paper also presents a survey of interdisciplinary applications of PIML in materials science, biomedical engineering, and fractional calculus. In this context, the review also analyzes open challenges and outlines future directions in the field.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carlos A. Valentim
Universidade de São Paulo
Sergio A. David
Universidade de São Paulo
Dynamics
Universidade de São Paulo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Valentim et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b17a487c87a6a40d2db — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics6020016
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: