This article aims to interrogate the pragmatics of the texts of Jean-Paul Sartre, in the light of the thought of textuality by Jacques Derrida. When Sartre tells his readers that they are free, is he describing a reality, or is he attempting to transform their condition? Even though Derrida always claimed to reject completely his predecessor, many theoretical points and projects draw them into proximity – such as, for instance, a conception of philosophy as a material action that aims to constitute, or even transform, reality, and not just to describe it. But if I turn to an author or his texts as a guide for action, it may seem that I am no longer the sole agent of my freedom, and thus that I act in bad faith, losing the authenticity of those who accept full responsibility of their acts. Derridean thought would counter this concern by suggesting that Sartre’s text, as encountered by a reader, unavoidably becomes a supplement to their own agency – and that this is not a threat, but an opportunity to rethink the ethical and political stakes of philosophical writing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuel Buchoul
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuel Buchoul (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b4ea487c87a6a40d7b5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.130060