infection (LTBI), other pulmonary diseases, and healthy volunteers at a tertiary care centre. Among 653 participants enrolled in this study, 192 were diagnosed as having ATB, and the remaining 461 were classified as non-ATB, including 137 cases of LTBI, 224 cases of other pulmonary diseases, and 100 healthy volunteers. The corresponding AUCs of the MTB-HR in distinguishing untreated ATB from non-ATB, LTBI, other pulmonary diseases, and healthy volunteers were 0.814 (95% CI, 0.760-0.868, sensitivity 76.1%, specificity 71.6%), 0.739 (95% CI, 0.667-0.812, sensitivity 59.7%, specificity 78.1%), 0.825 (95% CI, 0.770-0.880, sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 65.6%), 0.892 (95% CI, 0.839-0.945, sensitivity 76.1%, specificity 88.0%), respectively. When only samples with TAT of less than 1 h were included, the AUC of the MTB-HR in distinguishing untreated ATB from non-ATB was largest, 0.920 (95% CI, 0.822-1.000, sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 87.7%). In conclusion, the MTB-HR assay shows potential as a rapid, blood-based screening and triage test for ATB, especially for untreated ATB, with the advantage of increased diagnostic yield since blood is more readily available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: