Key result
Novel EHR algorithm identifies ISTH major and CRNM bleeding to compare trial and real-world data.
Why the study?
Bleeding events in real-world evidence sources are not identified using ISTH definitions, requiring algorithms to assist with accurate comparisons between clinical trials and real-world studies.
A novel algorithm was developed to identify ISTH-defined major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events in real-world electronic health records, facilitating comparisons between clinical trials and real-world evidence.
Introduction: In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), bleeding outcomes are often assessed using definitions provided by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Information relating to bleeding events in real-world evidence (RWE) sources are not identified using these definitions. To assist with accurate comparisons between clinical trials and real-world studies, algorithms are required for the identification of ISTH-defined bleeding events in RWE sources. Objectives: To present a novel algorithm to identify ISTH-defined major and clinically-relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events in a US Electronic Health Record (EHR) database. Methods: The ISTH definition for major bleeding was divided into three subclauses: fatal bleeds, critical organ bleeds and symptomatic bleeds associated with haemoglobin reductions. Data elements from EHRs required to identify patients fulfilling these subclauses (algorithm components) were defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, Clinical Modification disease codes that describe key bleeding events. Other data providing context to bleeding severity included in the algorithm were: 'interaction type' (diagnosis in the inpatient or outpatient setting), 'position' (primary/discharge or secondary diagnosis), haemoglobin values from laboratory tests, blood transfusion codes and mortality data. Results: 2 g/dL over 48 hours) and mortality. Conclusions: The novel algorithm proposed here identifies ISTH major and CRNM bleeding events that are commonly investigated in RCTs in a real-world EHR data source. This algorithm could facilitate comparison between the frequency of bleeding outcomes recorded in clinical trials and RWE. Validation of algorithm performance is in progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartenstein et al. (2023) studied Bleeding events. Algorithm for ISTH-defined bleeding events was evaluated on Identification of ISTH major and CRNM bleeding events. A novel algorithm using EHR data was developed to identify ISTH-defined major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding events, facilitating comparisons between clinical trials and real-world data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: