PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 1995Archives of Internal Medicine233 citations

Physician Attitudes About Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly

View Full Paper
DMDouglas C McCrory

Key Result

Physicians reported a significantly lower likelihood of using anticoagulant therapy and targeted lower anticoagulation intensities for 75-year-old versus 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=1,189)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does patient age affect a physician's reported likelihood of using or intensity of anticoagulant therapy for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
1189 randomly selected office-based practitioners (primary care, cardiology, neurology) nationwide (38% response rate)
I
Intervention
Vignette-based questionnaire assessing attitudes towards anticoagulation for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at ages 55, 65, and 75
O
Outcome
Reported likelihood of using anticoagulant therapy and target intensity of anticoagulation

Physicians are less likely to prescribe anticoagulant therapy, and target lower intensities, for older patients (75 years) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to younger patients.

Main Result

p-value: p=< .0001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to determine whether patient age affects a physician's reported likelihood of using anticoagulant therapy or the intensity of anticoagulant therapy for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We surveyed a nationwide sample of 1189 randomly selected office-based practitioners in three strata: primary care (geriatrics, internal medicine, family practice, and general practice), cardiology, and neurology. A vignette-based questionnaire was used to measure attitudes and beliefs regarding anticoagulation risks and effectiveness, barriers to anticoagulation in clinical practice, and likelihood of using anticoagulation and target intensity of anticoagulation at three patient ages (55, 65, and 75 years) for four clinical scenarios (chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation with mild left atrial enlargement, intermittent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, recent-onset atrial fibrillation, and atrial fibrillation with recent 3 months embolic stroke). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 38%. The mean likelihoods of using anticoagulation for the three ages were unequal (P < .0001) for each scenario. Most physicians were "very" or "somewhat" likely to use anticoagulant therapy for a 65-year-old with left atrial enlargement (71%), intermittent or paryoxysmal atrial fibrillation (68%), recent-onset atrial fibrillation (86%), or embolic stroke (96%). Fewer physicians were likely to use anticoagulant therapy for a 75-year-old with left atrial enlargement (63%), intermittent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (56%), recent-onset atrial fibrillation (80%), or embolic stroke (93%). Among physicians equally likely to use anticoagulation for 65- and 75-year-old patients, intensity of anticoagulant therapy (target international normalized ratio or prothrombin time ratio) was lower (P < .04) for the 75-year-old. CONCLUSION: Anticoagulant therapy may be less often and less intensively used for elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Douglas C McCrory (1995) conducted a cross-sectional in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (n=1,189). Anticoagulant therapy was evaluated on Likelihood of using anticoagulation and target intensity of anticoagulation at three patient ages (p=< .0001). Physicians reported a significantly lower likelihood of using anticoagulant therapy and targeted lower anticoagulation intensities for 75-year-old versus 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0846b0ab15ea61dee8c123https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1995.00430030071008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper