Key result
The Rose questionnaire demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 97% for detecting angina pectoris when compared to clinical judgment.
Why the study?
What is the sensitivity and specificity of the Rose questionnaire compared to clinical judgment for diagnosing angina pectoris in white men?
Population
White men evaluated for angina pectoris
Comparison
Rose questionnaire vs Clinical judgment
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
Supports Rose questionnaire for population-level angina assessment; leaves open its role in individual clinical decisions.
Observational
What is the sensitivity and specificity of the Rose questionnaire compared to clinical judgment for diagnosing angina pectoris in white men?
The Rose questionnaire is a highly specific and reasonably sensitive tool for identifying angina pectoris, with response variability reflecting the natural history of the disease rather than questionnaire unreliability.
S. Heyden (1971) conducted an observational in Angina pectoris. Rose questionnaire vs. Clinical judgment was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the Rose questionnaire. The Rose questionnaire demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 97% for detecting angina pectoris when compared to clinical judgment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: