Key result
Heart failure symptom burden strongly links to depressive symptoms, while low optimism acts indirectly via hopelessness.
Why the study?
Depressive symptoms are common in patients with heart failure and associated with adverse outcomes, prompting examination of depressive symptoms and their determinants based on the hopelessness theory of depression.
What are the determinants of depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure based on the hopelessness theory of depression?
Cross-Sectional (n=282)
No
What are the determinants of depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure based on the hopelessness theory of depression?
Effect estimate: β = 0.406
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with heart failure, symptom burden, decreased optimism, and hopelessness directly contribute to depressive symptoms, highlighting potential targets for psychological interventions.
Symptom burden may drive depressive symptoms in HF; supports hopelessness theory but leaves causal pathways and interventions open for prospective study.
AIMS: Depressive symptoms are common in patients with heart failure (HF) and are associated with adverse outcomes in this group. This study examined depressive symptoms and associated determinants in patients with HF based on the hopelessness theory of depression. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 282 patients with HF were recruited from 3 cardiovascular units of a university hospital. Symptom burden, optimism, maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies (MCERSs), hopelessness, and depressive symptoms were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. A path analysis model was established to evaluate the direct and indirect effects. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 13.8% in the patients. Symptom burden had the greatest direct effect on depressive symptoms (β = 0.406; P < 0.001), optimism affected depressive symptoms both directly and indirectly with hopelessness as the mediator (direct: β = -0.360; P = 0.001; indirect: β = -0.169; P < 0.001), and MCERSs only had an indirect effect on depressive symptoms with hopelessness as the mediator (β = 0.035; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with HF, symptom burden, decreased optimism, and hopelessness contribute to depressive symptoms directly. What is more, decreased optimism and MCERS lead to depressive symptoms indirectly via hopelessness. Accordingly, interventions aimed at decreasing symptom burden, enhancing optimism, and reducing the use of MCERSs, while declining hopelessness, may be conducive to relieving depressive symptoms in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in heart failure (n=282). Symptom burden, optimism, MCERSs, and hopelessness was evaluated on Depressive symptoms (β = 0.406, p=<0.001). Symptom burden had the greatest direct effect on depressive symptoms in heart failure patients (β = 0.406; P < 0.001), while decreased optimism and MCERS acted indirectly via hopelessness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: