Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have recently gained importance for the treatment of water contaminated with heavy metal. However, conventional chemical synthesis of MNPs involves production of hazardous by‐products. In the present study, starch (MNP ST ) and casein (MNP CS ) functionalized MNPs were prepared via green synthesis and compared efficiency with bare MNPs. RESULTS Here, we prepared MNP, MNP ST, and MNP CS with average sizes of 7.1, 9.0, and 9.7 nm, respectively. We conducted an adsorption study under optimized conditions such as temperature, pH, etc., and observed that the removal of lead(II) (Pb(II)) and chromium(VI) (Cr(IV)) follows the pseudo‐second‐order kinetic model for all MNPs. The experimental data fits better with Langmuir isotherm, and the maximal adsorption capacity ( Q m ) of MNP ST was highest with 120.48 mg g −1 for Pb(II) and 99.0 mg g −1 for Cr(VI) compared to MNP CS [101.11 mg g −1 for Pb(II) and 87.81 mg g −1 for Cr(VI)] and MNP [74.07 mg g −1 for Pb(II) and 68.96 mg g −1 for Cr(VI)]. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that better regeneration capacity of MNP ST was only 8.0% reduction of its removal efficiency, followed by MNP CS (12.1%) and MNP (14.8%). CONCLUSION Therefore, our findings revealed that starch capped magnetite nano‐adsorbent could be used for the efficient removal of heavy metal from water with excellent regeneration efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: