PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2004Circulation685 citationsOpen Access

Left Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation in the Management of High-Risk Patients Affected by the Long-QT Syndrome

View Full Paper
PSPeter J. SchwartzSPSilvia G. PrioriMCMarina Cerrone

Key Result

Left cardiac sympathetic denervation reduced the mean yearly number of cardiac events per patient by 91% (P<0.001) compared to pre-procedure rates in high-risk long-QT syndrome patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=147)

Structured PICO

Does left cardiac sympathetic denervation reduce the incidence of cardiac events in high-risk patients with long-QT syndrome?

P
Population
147 high-risk patients with long-QT syndrome (LQTS), with very prolonged QTc (543+/-65 ms), 99% symptomatic, 48% with prior cardiac arrest, and 75% remaining symptomatic despite beta-blockers.
I
Intervention
Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD)
C
Comparator
Pre-LCSD event rates (intra-patient before-and-after comparison)
O
Outcome
Incidence of cardiac events (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, sudden death)hard clinical

Left cardiac sympathetic denervation significantly reduces the incidence of cardiac events and ICD shocks in high-risk LQTS patients, though it does not completely eliminate the risk of sudden cardiac death.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 91% reduction

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • LCSD is not entirely effective in preventing cardiac events including sudden cardiac death during long-term follow-up

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients who continue to have cardiac events (CEs) despite beta-blockers is complex. We assessed the long-term efficacy of left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) in a group of high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 147 LQTS patients who underwent LCSD. Their QT interval was very prolonged (QTc, 543+/-65 ms); 99% were symptomatic; 48% had a cardiac arrest; and 75% of those treated with beta-blockers remained symptomatic. The average follow-up periods between first CE and LCSD and post-LCSD were 4.6 and 7.8 years, respectively. After LCSD, 46% remained asymptomatic. Syncope occurred in 31%, aborted cardiac arrest in 16%, and sudden death in 7%. The mean yearly number of CEs per patient dropped by 91% (P5 CEs declined from 55% to 8% (P<0.001). In 5 patients with preoperative implantable defibrillator and multiple discharges, the post-LCSD count of shocks decreased by 95% (P=0.02) from a median number of 25 to 0 per patient. Among 51 genotyped patients, LCSD appeared more effective in LQT1 and LQT3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: LCSD is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aborted cardiac arrest and syncope in high-risk LQTS patients when compared with pre-LCSD events. However, LCSD is not entirely effective in preventing cardiac events including sudden cardiac death during long-term follow-up. LCSD should be considered in patients with recurrent syncope despite beta-blockade and in patients who experience arrhythmia storms with an implanted defibrillator.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schwartz et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Long-QT syndrome (n=147). Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) vs. Pre-LCSD events (within-patient comparison) was evaluated on Mean yearly number of cardiac events per patient (91% reduction, p=<0.001). Left cardiac sympathetic denervation reduced the mean yearly number of cardiac events per patient by 91% (P<0.001) compared to pre-procedure rates in high-risk long-QT syndrome patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08623dafa0a1b8dbddf50chttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000125523.14403.1e
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper