Key result
DOACs cut stroke ~36% and lower mortality vs VKAs in AF patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Why the study?
This study aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing chronic hemodialysis, comparing direct oral anticoagulants to vitamin K antagonists.
Do DOACs reduce the risk of stroke, mortality, and bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis?
Meta-Analysis
Do DOACs reduce the risk of stroke, mortality, and bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis?
In patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis, DOACs are associated with significantly lower risks of stroke, mortality, and major bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Supports DOAC preference over VKAs in hemodialysis AF; leaves open confirmation by RCTs before practice change.
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing chronic hemodialysis, comparing the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists. A systematic search was conducted across various databases including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Efficacy outcomes focused on the risk of stroke and mortality, whereas safety outcomes assessed the risk of bleeding. Review Manager generated forest plots for data synthesis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and random-effects models were used. Subgroup analysis identified the sources of heterogeneity. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The risk of all-cause stroke [risk ratio (RR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.81; P = 0.0001; I2 = 0%], ischemic stroke (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.29-0.96; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60-0.88; P = 0.001; I2 = 71%), major bleeding (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.76; P < 0.00001; I2 = 44%), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53-0.85; P = 0.0009; I2 = 36%), intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.84; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%) were lower in the DOAC group compared with the vitamin K antagonist group. The risk of cardiovascular-related death (RR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.69-2.60; P = 0.39; I2 = 0%), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.75-1.08; P = 0.26; I2 = 28%), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.06-2.24; P = 0.28; I2 = 10%) showed no significant differences. In conclusion, the risks of all-cause stroke, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing chronic hemodialysis were lower in the DOAC group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goyal et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists was evaluated on All-cause stroke (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81, p=0.0001). Direct oral anticoagulants reduced the risk of all-cause stroke (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.81; P=0.0001) and mortality compared to vitamin K antagonists in AF patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: