Key result
CMR provides comprehensive myocardial tissue characterization but faces slow clinical adoption in India from limited expertise.
Why the study?
The adoption of CMR in India has been slow due to limited clinical understanding of how it works and its clinical applications.
This primer aims to improve clinician understanding and adoption of cardiac magnetic resonance for myocardial tissue characterization, particularly in India.
Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of cardiac conditions. Over the last three decades, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has established itself as a promising imaging tool in the assessment of patients with various cardiac ailments. CMR is now being considered as a one-stop-shop diagnostic test because of its ability to comprehensively assess the heart. The greatest strength of CMR is its ability to characterize the myocardium noninvasively aiding in the diagnosis of patients. Despite its growing use worldwide, the adoption of the modality in India has been relatively slow. One major reason for this is the lack of expertise and resources to perform CMR. Another reason for the slow adoption of CMR in India is the limited understanding of practicing clinicians on how the modality works and what the various clinical applications of CMR are. In this review, we aimed to address these shortcomings by outlining some basics of CMR and its utility in day-to-day practice with a special focus on myocardial tissue characterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gowda et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiac conditions. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance serves as a comprehensive diagnostic tool for noninvasive myocardial tissue characterization, though its clinical adoption in India remains slow due to limited expertise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: