We present theoretical results pertaining to the ability of lscr p minimization to recover sparse and compressible signals from incomplete and noisy measurements. In particular, we extend the results of Candes, Romberg and Tao (2005) to the p < 1 case. Our results indicate that depending on the restricted isometry constants (see, e.g., Candes and Tao (2006; 2005)) and the noise level, lscr p minimization with certain values of p < 1 provides better theoretical guarantees in terms of stability and robustness than lscr 1 minimization does. This is especially true when the restricted isometry constants are relatively large.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saab et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: