Why the study?
Although ARNi and SGLT2i improve outcomes in HFrEF, data characterizing their effectiveness after CRT implant are relatively scarce.
Does the addition of ARNi and/or SGLT2i improve CRT response and cardiac function in HFrEF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Does the addition of ARNi and/or SGLT2i improve CRT response and cardiac function in HFrEF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of ARNi and SGLT2 inhibitors in HFrEF patients undergoing CRT implantation significantly improves 1-year CRT response, NYHA class, and left ventricular ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and the sodium- glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have improved the outcome of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data characterizing their effectiveness after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant are relatively scarce. This study investigated the impact of ARNi and SGLT2i treatment 1) on CRT response at 12 months 2) on the cardiac function and the clinical functional status (NYHA class) at mid- and long-term follow-up 3) on the cardiac and overall survival at long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS HFrEF patients referred for CRT implant were enrolled in the study and were grouped by the ARNi/SGLT2i therapy. A first analysis investigated the synergistic impact of these drugs started at implant on 1-year CRT response and included all 172 patients enrolled. In order to evaluate whether the time of ARNi/SGLT2i initiation after CRT response assessment is meaningful, a second analysis considered 100 patients with a follow-up ≥ 24 months. The median follow-up was 63.1 (confidence interval [CI] 95%, 52.7 - 73.8) months. At 1-year follow-up, 40 of 51 (78.4%) patients in ARNi or SGLT2i group and 66 of 121 (54.5%) in the no treatment group were classified as responders (p = 0.006). In multivariable analysis, ARNi/SGLT2i use was an independent predictor of CRT response (odds ratio, 5.38; CI 95%, 2-16.2; p = 0.001). At mid-term follow-up (median time [interquartile range, IQR] 40.6 [25.2; 58.3] months), 61 patients started to assume these drugs. NYHA functional class improved in 23 (37.7%) patients and decreased in only 2 (3.3%) in ARNi/SGLT2i patients vs 13 (33.3%) in no treatment group (p < 0.001). ARNi and SGLT2i improved significantly also the Δ LVEF, with a median [IQR] increase of 4 [2; 8] % compared to the no treatment group - 1.8 [-4; 0.2] % (p < 0.001) and were independently associated with a NYHA functional class II or I at long-term (hazard ratio [HR], 3.67; CI 95%, 1.37-10.2; p < 0.001). Their estimated effectiveness was consistent over the entire follow-up period (Schoenfeld residuals test, p = 0.10), although without reaching statistical significance effects on cardiovascular survival (HR, 0.61; CI 95%, 0.25-1.50; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS The ARNi and SGLT2i treatment in CRT patients improves the clinical and echocardiographic response at 12-month and long-term follow-up, independently from the time of initiation. These drugs also confer benefit on survival, however further studies are needed to confirm these data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fonderico et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: