Key result
Full secondary prevention after noncardioembolic stroke is linked to ~61% fewer recurrent strokes versus none.
Why the study?
Does the optimal combination of secondary prevention medication classes reduce recurrent stroke and major vascular events in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke?
Cohort (n=3,680)
Yes
Does the optimal combination of secondary prevention medication classes reduce recurrent stroke and major vascular events in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke?
Optimal combination of evidence-based secondary prevention medications significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke, major vascular events, and death in patients with recent noncardioembolic stroke.
Optimal secondary prevention may lower recurrent stroke risk; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of optimal combination of evidence-based drug therapies including antihypertensive agents, lipid modifiers, and antithrombotic agents on risk of recurrent vascular events after stroke. METHODS: We analyzed the database of a multicenter trial involving 3,680 recent noncardioembolic stroke patients aged 35 years or older and followed for 2 years. Patients were categorized by appropriateness level 0 to III depending on the number of drugs prescribed divided by the number of drugs potentially indicated for each patient (0 = none of the indicated medications prescribed and III = all indicated medications prescribed). Independent associations of medication appropriateness level with recurrent stroke (primary outcome), stroke/coronary heart disease/vascular death as major vascular events (secondary outcome), and death (tertiary outcome) were assessed. RESULTS: The unadjusted rate of stroke declined with increasing medication appropriateness level (15.9% for level 0, 10.3% for level I, 8.6% for level II, and 7.3% for level III). Compared with level 0: the adjusted hazard ratio of stroke for level I was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.25), level II 0.50 (0.23-1.09), and level III 0.39 (0.18-0.84); of stroke/coronary heart disease/vascular death for level I 0.60 (0.32-1.14), level II 0.45 (0.25-0.80), and level III 0.39 (0.22-0.69); and of death for level I 0.89 (0.30-2.64), level II 0.71 (0.26-1.93), and level III 0.35 (0.13-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal combination of secondary prevention medication classes after a recent noncardioembolic stroke is associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke, major vascular events, and death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in recent noncardioembolic stroke (n=3,680). Level III appropriateness (all indicated medications prescribed) vs. Level 0 appropriateness (none of the indicated medications prescribed) was evaluated on recurrent stroke (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.84). Prescribing all indicated secondary prevention medications after noncardioembolic stroke reduced the risk of recurrent stroke compared to prescribing none (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.18-0.84).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: