Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study whether uncertainty shocks are transmitted to energy transition metal (ETM) prices. Using a quantile vector autoregression model, we assess the impact on ETM price changes of shocks arising from economic policy uncertainty, climate policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, financial market uncertainty, and oil price uncertainty. We document that the impact of uncertainty is U-shaped across ETM price quantiles, with modest effects in the intermediate quantiles and stronger impacts in the extreme, but mainly upper, quantiles. Climate policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk are the main uncertainty drivers in the extreme quantiles, while financial- and oil-related uncertainties have more pervasive effects in the intermediate quantiles. This evidence has implications for policymakers regarding the implementation cost of transition policies that generate uncertainties, and for investors in ETM futures markets regarding diversification and tail risk management decisions. • We quantify the impact of uncertainty shocks on different ETM price quantiles. • The impact of uncertainty is U-shaped across quantiles. • Climate policy and geopolitical uncertainties especially impact the extreme quantiles. • Financial- and oil-related uncertainties especially impact the intermediate quantiles. • The uncertainty impact depends on the ETM market state and uncertainty size and source.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reboredo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: