PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2004Spine359 citations

Patient Expectations of Treatment for Back Pain

View Full Paper
JVJos VerbeekMSMarie-José SengersLRLinda Riemens

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence from studies among patients with low back pain on their expectations and satisfaction with treatment as part of practice guideline development. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients are often dissatisfied with treatment for acute or chronic back pain. METHODS: We searched the literature for studies on patient expectations and satisfaction with treatment for low back pain. Treatment aspects related to expectations or satisfaction were identified in qualitative studies. Percentages of dissatisfied patients were calculated from quantitative studies. RESULTS: Twelve qualitative and eight quantitative studies were found. Qualitative studies revealed the following aspects that patient expectation from treatment for back pain or with which they are dissatisfied. Patients want a clear diagnosis of the cause of their pain, information and instructions, pain relief, and a physical examination. Next, expectations are that there are more diagnostic tests, other therapy or referrals to specialists, and sickness certification. They expect confirmation from the healthcare provider that their pain is real. Like other patients, they want a confidence-based association that includes understanding, listening, respect, and being included in decision-making. The results from qualitative studies are confirmed by quantitative studies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients have explicit expectations on diagnosis, instructions, and interpersonal management. New strategies need to be developed in order to meet patients' expectations better. Practice guidelines should pay more attention to the best way of discussing the causes and diagnosis with the patient and should involve them in the decision-making process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Verbeek et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a086beb1e0fcf4a43e8c392https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000142007.38256.7f
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chronic Low Back Pain1994 · 126 citations
  2. 2Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison1999 · 295 citations
  3. 3The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review1998 · 534 citations
  4. 4Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study1999 · 208 citations
  5. 5Why are sicker patients less satisfied with their medical care? Tests of two explanatory models.1998 · 109 citations