Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let x be a random variable such that, given theta, x is Poisson with mean theta, while theta has an unknown prior distribution G. In many statistical problems one wants to estimate as accurately as possible the parameter E(thetax = a) for some given a = 0,1,.... If one assumes that G is a Gamma prior with unknown parameters alpha and beta, then the problem is straightforward, but the estimate may not be consistent if G is not Gamma. On the other hand, a more general empirical Bayes estimator will always be consistent but will be inefficient if in fact G is Gamma. It is shown that this dilemma can be more or less resolved for large samples by combining the two methods of estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herbert Robbins (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: