Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The introduction of new technologies such as GIS and GPS has led to demands for more detailed and accurate soils information than is available in traditional soil surveys. One of the common methods for acquiring more detailed soils information is through apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) surveys conducted by slowly pulling EC a equipment through fields along transects and collecting georeferenced EC a data. This study investigated how well the data collected from these transect surveys represent soil map units (SMUs) established by Order 1 soil surveys. On the whole, the transect surveys did a good job of representing the field SMUs. However, SMUs that were only present in a small percentage (<5% by area) of the fields studied tended to be represented fairly poorly. The SMUs that were present in more than 5% of the field area tended to be represented well by the transect surveys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric C. Brevik (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: