Why the study?
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with nocturnal cough and changes in heart rate, motivating unobtrusive non-contact monitoring methods.
Does a non-contact system using in-pillow cloth electrodes accurately measure cECG and cEMG in adults?
Does a non-contact system using in-pillow cloth electrodes accurately measure cECG and cEMG in adults?
A proof-of-concept non-contact in-pillow electrode system demonstrated feasibility for unobtrusive detection of heart rate and cough.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of in-pillow electrodes; leaves open larger validation before clinical adoption.
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with nocturnal cough and changes in heart rate. In this work, the authors propose a proof-of-concept non-contact system for performing capacitive electrocardiogram (cECG) and cough-associated capacitive electromyogram (cEMG) measurements using cloth electrodes under a pillowcase. Two electrodes were located along with the approximate vector of lead II ECG and were used for both cECG and cEMG measurements. A signature voltage follower was introduced after each electrode to detect biopotentials with amplitudes of approximately 100 µV. A bootstrapping technique and nonlinear electrical component were combined and implemented in the voltage follower to attain a high input impedance and rapid static discharge. The measurement system was evaluated in a laboratory experiment for seven adult males and one female (average age: 22.5 ± 1.3 yr). The accuracy of R-wave detection for 2-min resting periods was 100% in six subjects, with an overall average of 87.5% ± 30.0%. Clearly visible cEMGs were obtained for each cough motion for all subjects, synchronized with reference EMGs from submental muscle. Although there remains room for improvement in practical use, the proposed system is promising for unobtrusive detection of heart rate and cough over a prolonged period of time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takano et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: