Why the study?
Some FBN1 variants of uncertain significance remain inconclusive despite applying the ClinGen FBN1-specific guideline, warranting reassessment using newly released ClinGen guidance for PP1/BS4 and PP4 criteria.
Does the use of updated ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria improve the reclassification rate of FBN1 variants of uncertain significance in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome compared to FBN1-specific guidelines alone?
Does the use of updated ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria improve the reclassification rate of FBN1 variants of uncertain significance in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome compared to FBN1-specific guidelines alone?
Applying updated ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria significantly increases the reclassification of FBN1 variants of uncertain significance to pathogenic or likely pathogenic in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome.
May aid FBN1 VUS reclassification with updated PP1/PP4 criteria; leaves open effects on Marfan diagnosis and management.
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a genetic disorder caused by an FBN1 variant and is diagnosed based on the revised Ghent criteria, which incorporate clinical manifestations and genetic testing. Up-to-date FBN1 variant interpretation is crucial for proper diagnosis and management of MFS; however, some FBN1 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) remain inconclusive despite applying Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) FBN1-specific guideline. Recently, the ClinGen guidance for PP1/BS4 co-segregation and PP4 phenotype specificity criteria (new PP1/PP4 criteria) were released. Here, we performed reassessment of FBN1 VUSs using these new PP1/PP4 criteria. FBN1 VUSs collected from December 2015 to April 2024 were reassessed according to the ClinGen FBN1-specific guideline and new PP1/PP4 criteria. Medical records and previous studies were reviewed to evaluate the phenotype-specificity of evidence based on the revised Ghent criteria. Collectively, 927 patients with suspected MFS underwent FBN1 sequencing and 72 VUSs were detected. When applying the FBN1-specific guideline only, of 72 VUSs, 29 (40.3%) were reclassified as pathogenic variants (PVs) or likely PVs (LPVs). When additionally applying the new PP1/PP4 criteria, 16 (37.2%) of the remaining 43 VUSs were reclassified as LPVs. After reassessing FBN1 VUSs according to the new PP1/PP4 criteria, the rate of reclassification from VUS to PV/LPV significantly increased from 40.3% to 62.5%. The new PP1/PP4 criteria provide sufficient evidence for evaluating the pathogenicity of FBN1 variants detected in MFS patients fulfilling the revised Ghent criteria and will be helpful in clinical analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: