Why the study?
What are the long-term outcomes and rates of appropriate therapy after ICD implantation for primary versus secondary prevention in adult congenital heart disease patients?
What are the long-term outcomes and rates of appropriate therapy after ICD implantation for primary versus secondary prevention in adult congenital heart disease patients?
ICD implantation in ACHD patients yields a high incidence of appropriate therapy for both primary and secondary prevention, with comparable long-term outcomes between the two indications.
Background: Ventricular arrhythmia is a common cause of mortality in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). The beneficial effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in patients with ACHD have been demonstrated; however, evidence on this topic remains insufficient. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes after ICD implantation in the ACHD population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 35 consecutive patients with ACHD who underwent ICD implantation between December 2012 and August 2022. ICD implantation was classified as primary or secondary prevention. The long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy, and complications related to ICD implantation, were evaluated. Results: Among the 35 patients, 18 patients underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention. During a median follow-up period of 1484 days, 3 patients in the primary prevention group and 1 patient in the secondary prevention group died. The 2- and 5-year all-cause mortality rates were 6.2% and 13.6%, respectively. Two (11.1%) and 4 (23.5%) patients in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively, received appropriate therapy. Six patients (17%) were administered inappropriate therapy, and 2 patients (5.7%) experienced device-related complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in the all-cause mortality or the rates of appropriate and inappropriate therapy between the primary and secondary prevention groups (p = 0.297, p = 0.427, and p = 0.490, respectively). Conclusions: The incidence of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ACHD was considerably high and comparable to that observed in patients with acquired heart disease, both in primary and secondary prevention. ICD implantation for primary prevention as well as for secondary prevention may be important in patients with ACHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishiwata et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Congenital heart disease adultsMore from Congenital Heart Disease