PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1984Circulation156 citationsOpen Access

Global and regional left ventricular function and tomographic radionuclide perfusion: the Western Washington Intracoronary Streptokinase In Myocardial Infarction Trial.

View Full Paper
JRJames L. RitchieKDKathryn DavisDWDavid L. Williams

Key Result

Intracoronary streptokinase did not significantly improve global ejection fraction compared to conventional heparin therapy in acute myocardial infarction (45.9% vs 46.1%, p=NS).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=250)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does intracoronary streptokinase followed by heparin improve global and regional ejection fraction or reduce infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to conventional therapy with heparin?

P
Population
250 patients with acute myocardial infarction and coronary angiographic diagnosis of thrombosis
I
Intervention
Intracoronary streptokinase followed by heparin
C
Comparator
Conventional therapy with heparin
O
Outcome
Global and regional ejection fraction determined by radionuclide ventriculography at 62 +/- 35 days after infarctionsurrogate

Intracoronary streptokinase followed by heparin did not significantly improve global or regional ejection fraction or reduce infarct size compared to conventional heparin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 45.9% vs 46.1%

p-value: p=NS

Abstract

The Western Washington Intracoronary Streptokinase In Myocardial Infarction Trial enrolled 250 patients with acute myocardial infarction. After the coronary angiographic diagnosis of thrombosis, patients were randomly assigned to receive either conventional therapy with heparin or intracoronary streptokinase followed by heparin. Of the 232 patients who survived at least 60 days, 207 (89%) underwent radionuclide ventriculographic determination of global and regional ejection fraction at a single institution at 62 +/- 35 days after infarction. In the first 100 patients, infarct size was also determined by quantitative single-photon emission tomographic imaging with thallium-201 (201Tl) and expressed as a percentage of the left ventricle with a perfusion defect. Overall, global ejection fraction did not differ between patients treated with streptokinase (45.9 +/- 13.9%; n = 115) and control patients (46.1 +/- 14.4%; n = 92, p = NS). Similarly, the regional posterolateral, inferior, and anteroseptal ejection fraction did not differ between the two groups. Infarct size as measured by 201Tl tomography was 19.4 +/- 12.8% (n = 52) of the left ventricle for the streptokinase group and 19.6 +/- 11.8% (n = 48; p = NS) for the control group. When patients were compared within groups by electrocardiographic location of infarction, time to treatment, or the presence or absence of vessel opening, there were no significant differences between streptokinase and control patients. Statistical inclusion of the 18 patients who died early and were unavailable for study also failed to modify the results, except for a possible reduction in inferior infarct size as measured by 201Tl tomography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ritchie et al. (1984) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction (n=250). intracoronary streptokinase followed by heparin vs. conventional therapy with heparin was evaluated on global ejection fraction (p=NS). Intracoronary streptokinase did not significantly improve global ejection fraction compared to conventional heparin therapy in acute myocardial infarction (45.9% vs 46.1%, p=NS).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a088ce6ae7f011b61ddf18fhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.70.5.867
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper