A new 16-segment wall motion score on echocardiography showed good agreement with radionuclide angiography for LVEF assessment, with a mean bias of 0.61% and standard deviation of 6.2%.
Observational (n=95)
Does a new 16-segment wall motion score on TTE accurately estimate LVEF compared to radionuclide angiography in patients undergoing LVEF assessment?
A new 16-segment wall motion score on TTE provides an accurate and precise estimation of LVEF compared to radionuclide angiography.
Effect estimate: mean bias 0.61%
BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients. METHODS: The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision. CONCLUSION: LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method.
Lebeau et al. (Wed,) reported a observational. New 16-segment wall motion score (segmental EF 15-40-65 score) on TTE vs. Radionuclide angiography (RNA) was evaluated on LVEF agreement and correlation between TTE and RNA (mean bias 0.61%). A new 16-segment wall motion score on echocardiography showed good agreement with radionuclide angiography for LVEF assessment, with a mean bias of 0.61% and standard deviation of 6.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: