Key result
Different methods of data analysis for the BHS-protocol can cause the achieved grade for automated blood pressure devices to range from C to almost A for diastolic and D to B for systolic pressure.
Why the study?
Does the method of data analysis affect the reported accuracy grading of automated blood pressure measuring devices?
Does the method of data analysis affect the reported accuracy grading of automated blood pressure measuring devices?
The method of data analysis significantly impacts the accuracy grading of automated blood pressure devices, highlighting the need for standardized analytical approaches.
Device grading reliability may depend on analysis method; leaves open standardization of BHS-protocol approaches.
OBJECTIVE: To show that different methods of data analysis affect the grading that blood pressure measuring devices achieve according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS)-protocol. METHODS: Based on the somewhat unclear description of the exact method of data analysis in the BHS-protocol four different methods can be discerned. The effect on the grading-results is calculated for these four different options. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is shown that using these four different options the achieved grade can range for diastolic blood pressure from C (option 1) to almost A (option 4) and for systolic blood pressure from D (option 1) to B (option 4). Different researchers may well have used different methods. Option 1 is the method that should be used. Also it is stated that the systematic error and the standard deviation of differences (SDD) are measures that give more insight to describe a device's performance. Calculating the grades after correction for the systematic error shows its influence and that of the SDD on the reported accuracy of a blood pressure measuring device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braam et al. (2001) studied Blood pressure measurement. Different methods of data analysis was evaluated on Grading achieved according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS)-protocol. Different methods of data analysis for the BHS-protocol can cause the achieved grade for automated blood pressure devices to range from C to almost A for diastolic and D to B for systolic pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: