Why the study?
Does lower socioeconomic status influence haemostatic and rheological responses following psychological stress in middle-aged adults?
Does lower socioeconomic status influence haemostatic and rheological responses following psychological stress in middle-aged adults?
Lower socioeconomic status is associated with more prolonged elevations in procoagulant responses following psychological stress, which may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No data in source to evaluate socioeconomic effects on stress haemostasis; leaves open contribution to cardiovascular risk.
Low socioeconomic status (SES) and psychological stress are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, and both may influence haemostatic responses. Von Willebrand factor (vWF), Factor VIII, plasma viscosity, haematocrit, blood viscosity, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and fibrin D-dimer were measured at rest and following stressful tasks in 238 middle-aged British civil servants. SES was defined by grade of employment. Lower SES was associated with higher resting vWF, Factor VIII and plasma viscosity. Psychological stress stimulated increases in haemostatic and rheological factors. Initial stress responses did not vary with SES, but Factor VIII, plasma viscosity and blood viscosity remained more elevated 45 minutes post-stress in lower SES participants. High blood pressure stress reactivity was also associated with greater haemostatic responses. We conclude that lower SES is characterised by more prolonged elevations in procoagulant responses following psychological stress, and that these processes might contribute to increased cardiac risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunz-Ebrecht et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: