Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform well at a variety of syntactic, discourse, and reasoning tasks. While LLMs are increasingly deployed in many forms including conversational agents that interact with humans, we lack a grounded benchmark to measure how well LLMs understand social language. Here, we introduce a new theory-driven benchmark, SocKET, that contains 58 NLP tasks testing social knowledge which we group into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness. In tests on the benchmark, we demonstrate that current models attain only moderate performance but reveal significant potential for task transfer among different types and categories of tasks, which were predicted from theory. Through zero-shot evaluations, we show that pretrained models already possess some innate but limited capabilities of social language understanding and training on one category of tasks can improve zero-shot testing on others. Our benchmark provides a systematic way to analyze model performance on an important dimension of language and points to clear room for improvement to build more socially-aware LLMs. The resources are released at https://github.com/minjechoi/SOCKET.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Minje Choi
Stanford University
Jiaxin Pei
Palo Alto University
Sagar Kumar
Boston Children's Hospital
University of Michigan
University of Cambridge
Northeastern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Choi et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a089a00afa0a1b8dbde00cd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.699
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: