Key result
AI-ECG evaluated for predicting obstructive CAD in patients with stable angina.
Why the study?
Despite accumulating research on artificial intelligence-based ECG algorithms for predicting ACS, their application in stable angina is not well evaluated.
Does a new artificial intelligence-based quantitative electrocardiography (QCG) score improve the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina?
Observational (n=723)
Does a new artificial intelligence-based quantitative electrocardiography (QCG) score improve the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina?
A novel AI-based ECG score specifically trained on stable angina patients significantly improves the prediction of obstructive CAD compared to clinical features alone.
QCG score was associated with obstructive CAD; extends AI-ECG research but should not yet change practice in stable angina.
BACKGROUND: Despite accumulating research on artificial intelligence-based electrocardiography (ECG) algorithms for predicting acute coronary syndrome (ACS), their application in stable angina is not well evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the utility of an existing artificial intelligence-based quantitative electrocardiography (QCG) analyzer in stable angina and developed a new ECG biomarker more suitable for stable angina. METHODS: This single-center study comprised consecutive patients with stable angina. The independent and incremental value of QCG scores for coronary artery disease (CAD)-related conditions (ACS, myocardial injury, critical status, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and left ventricular dysfunction) for predicting obstructive CAD confirmed by invasive angiography was examined. Additionally, ECG signals extracted by the QCG analyzer were used as input to develop a new QCG score. RESULTS: Among 723 patients with stable angina (median age 68 years; male: 470/723, 65%), 497 (69%) had obstructive CAD. QCG scores for ACS and myocardial injury were independently associated with obstructive CAD (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.17 and OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16 per 10-point increase, respectively) but did not significantly improve prediction performance compared to clinical features. However, our new QCG score demonstrated better prediction performance for obstructive CAD (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.802) than the original QCG scores, with incremental predictive value in combination with clinical features (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.827 vs 0.730; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: QCG scores developed for acute conditions show limited performance in identifying obstructive CAD in stable angina. However, improvement in the QCG analyzer, through training on comprehensive ECG signals in patients with stable angina, is feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Stable Angina (n=723). Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiography Analysis vs. Invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Prediction of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Artificial intelligence-based electrocardiography analysis was evaluated for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease in 723 patients with stable angina, among whom 68.7% had obstructive CAD.