Our traditional approaches to science and mathematics education are based largely on intuitive notions and are, in some ways, rather unscientific. Whereas we usually tackle problems in science and engineering through the systematic use of fundamental principles, we often approach problems in science teaching by the seat of our pants, without deeper analysis. While we make great efforts in physics to understand the mechanisms that underlie observed phenomena, we are often content to consider scientists and students as “black boxes” whose internal intellectual functioning can be left largely unexamined in spite of its importance for teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
F. Reif (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: