Key result
Management of ACS in a South African secondary-level facility revealed >12-hour delays in first medical contact (46%) and inaccurate ECG diagnosis of STEMI (29.2%), with low thrombolysis rates (39.6%).
Why the study?
Little is known about the clinical profile and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the South African public sector.
Observational (n=214)
No
In a South African public healthcare setting, ACS management is severely compromised by delayed presentation, poor ECG diagnostic accuracy, and low rates of reperfusion therapy.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the clinical profile and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the South African public sector. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients presenting with ACS to a secondary-level healthcare facility in Cape Town during a one-year period to study the clinical profile and management of these patients. RESULTS: Among the 214 patients in this cohort, 48 (27.5%) had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 43 (24.7%) had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 83 (47.7%) unstable angina pectoris. We identified high rates of >12-hour delays in first medical contact after symptom onset (46%) and inaccurate ECG diagnosis of STEMI (29.2%), which were associated with low rates of thrombolysis (39.6%). High rates of non-adherence and ACS recurrence were also observed. CONCLUSION: To address the local challenges in ACS management highlighted in this study, we propose the development of a regional referral network prioritising access to expedited care and primary reperfusion interventions in ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uys et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndromes (n=214). Management of ACS in a South African secondary-level facility revealed >12-hour delays in first medical contact (46%) and inaccurate ECG diagnosis of STEMI (29.2%), with low thrombolysis rates (39.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: