Key result
Real-world dofetilide achieves higher acute AF and flutter conversion rates than trials, with acceptable safety.
Why the study?
What is the current clinical role, real-world efficacy, and safety of dofetilide in patients with arrhythmias?
What is the current clinical role, real-world efficacy, and safety of dofetilide in patients with arrhythmias?
Dofetilide remains a valuable and safe antiarrhythmic option for rhythm control in appropriate patients when initiated with proper hospital monitoring and renal dosing.
Supports dofetilide use with monitoring for AF conversion; leaves open need for prospective randomized confirmation.
Dofetilide is a class III antiarrhythmic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the conversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter and maintenance of sinus rhythm in symptomatic patients with persistent arrhythmia. Drug trials showed neutral mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients and those with heart failure. This is a review of postmarket data, including real-world efficacy and safety in a variety of populations. Dofetilide has been used off-label with success in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, as well as atrial tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia. The real-world acute conversion rate of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter is higher than that reported in clinical trials. Dofetilide has an acceptable safety profile when initiated (or reloaded) under hospital monitoring and dosed according to creatinine clearance. Dofetilide is well tolerated and a good choice for patients with acceptable renal function and a normal QT interval, especially if atrioventricular nodal blockade needs to be avoided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolbrette et al. (2018) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dofetilide was evaluated. Dofetilide demonstrates higher real-world acute conversion rates for atrial fibrillation and flutter than reported in clinical trials, with an acceptable safety profile under hospital monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: