PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 6, 2016Analytical Chemistry159 citations

Computational Prediction of Electron Ionization Mass Spectra to Assist in GC/MS Compound Identification

View Full Paper
FAFelicity AllenAPAllison PonRGRussell Greiner

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and validate a computational tool for predicting electron ionization mass spectra to assist in compound identification.
  • Utilized competitive fragmentation modeling for electron ionization (CFM-EI) to predict EI-MS from chemical structures in SMILES or InChI format.
  • Compared predicted spectra's dot product scores against measured mass spectra from the NIST database.
  • Assessed performance relative to existing methods including MetFrag and MOLGEN-MS on various compound identification tasks.
  • CFM-EI demonstrated superior dot product scores compared to traditional 'bar-code' spectra in modeling fragmentation likelihoods.
  • Outperformed MetFrag and MOLGEN-MS in compound identification tasks across a diverse dataset of derivatized and nonderivatized compounds.
  • Predictions provide a viable alternative for compound identification when reference standards are not available.

Abstract

We describe a tool, competitive fragmentation modeling for electron ionization (CFM-EI) that, given a chemical structure (e.g., in SMILES or InChI format), computationally predicts an electron ionization mass spectrum (EI-MS) (i.e., the type of mass spectrum commonly generated by gas chromatography mass spectrometry). The predicted spectra produced by this tool can be used for putative compound identification, complementing measured spectra in reference databases by expanding the range of compounds able to be considered when availability of measured spectra is limited. The tool extends CFM-ESI, a recently developed method for computational prediction of electrospray tandem mass spectra (ESI-MS/MS), but unlike CFM-ESI, CFM-EI can handle odd-electron ions and isotopes and incorporates an artificial neural network. Tests on EI-MS data from the NIST database demonstrate that CFM-EI is able to model fragmentation likelihoods in low-resolution EI-MS data, producing predicted spectra whose dot product scores are significantly better than full enumeration "bar-code" spectra. CFM-EI also outperformed previously reported results for MetFrag, MOLGEN-MS, and Mass Frontier on one compound identification task. It also outperformed MetFrag in a range of other compound identification tasks involving a much larger data set, containing both derivatized and nonderivatized compounds. While replicate EI-MS measurements of chemical standards are still a more accurate point of comparison, CFM-EI's predictions provide a much-needed alternative when no reference standard is available for measurement. CFM-EI is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/cfm-id/ for download and http://cfmid.wishartlab.com as a web service.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Allen et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08aeec280cd4e998e8d9b1https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01622
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper