This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The symmetry data of a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>d</a:mi></a:math>-dimensional quantum field theory (QFT) can often be captured in terms of a higher-dimensional symmetry topological field theory. In top-down (i.e., stringy) realizations of this structure, the QFT in question is localized in a higher-dimensional bulk. In many cases of interest, however, the associated (<c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:mi>d</c:mi><c:mo>+</c:mo><c:mn>1</c:mn></c:mrow></c:math>)-dimensional bulk is not fully gapped and one must instead consider a filtration of theories to reach a gapped bulk in <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>D</e:mi><e:mo>=</e:mo><e:mi>d</e:mi><e:mo>+</e:mo><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:math> dimensions. Overall, this leads us to a nested structure of relative symmetry theories which descend to coupled edge modes, with the original QFT degrees of freedom localized at a corner of this <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi>D</g:mi></g:math>-dimensional bulk system. We present a bottom-up characterization of this structure and also show how it naturally arises in a number of string-based constructions of QFTs with both finite and continuous symmetries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cvetič et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: