Bridges, as critical urban infrastructure, face multi-hazard events (earthquakes and vehicle impacts), yet current standards lack explicit performance guidelines for multiple hazards, underscoring the need for enhanced resilience strategies. Self-centering piers, which resist both vertical and lateral loads, offer promising seismic and multi-hazard performance, though their behavior under combined loading remains insufficiently explored. In this study, 1/3-scale tests on self-centering double-column bridge piers (SCDCBP) and RC double-column bridge piers (RCDCBP) were performed using a hybrid pseudo-static and dynamic loading protocol simulating independent impact and cyclic seismic events. Results indicate that self-centering piers exhibit superior residual self-centering and deformation capacity relative to RCDCBP under post-impact seismic loading, effectively mitigating severe damage. These findings validate the multi-hazard resilience potential of SCDCBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: