Nitrate leaching in turfgrass has been widely studied and found to increase when N was over‐applied, soluble N sources were used, N was applied to sandy soils, or excessive irrigation was applied. The objective of this study was to evaluate N leaching as nitrate, ammonium, and urea from hybrid bermudagrass on three soils (Sumter clay [fine‐silty, carbonatic, thermic Rendollic Eutrudept], Marvyn loamy sand [fine‐loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult], and sand) with three N sources (urea, polymer‐coated urea, urea plus nitrification/urease inhibitor) and a control. Field lysimeters were fertilized at 7.3 g N m −2 in July, and leachate collected for 10 to 12 wk each year for 2 yr. Leachate was analyzed for nitrate‐N, ammonium‐N, and urea‐N. In the first year, significant nitrate‐N was collected, regardless of N source. In that year nitrate‐N in leachate from the clay soil frequently exceeded 10 mg N L −1 , even in the unfertilized treatment. High organic matter in the clay soil and N mineralization following construction contributed to nitrate leaching. In the second year, nitrate‐N in leachate never exceeded 10 mg N L −1 , regardless of N source or soil type. Differences in total nitrate‐N and ammonium‐N leached due to N source were found in the loamy sand and sand soils, typically in the order: urea ≥ urea + inhibitor ≥ polymer‐coated urea = unfertilized control. Small quantities of urea‐N leached throughout the experiments. If applied at a recommended rate to established turfgrass, leaching of N did not present an environmental hazard. Use of a slow‐release N source sometimes further reduced N losses in leachate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guertal et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: