Key result
Routine pre-participation electrocardiogram screening in young athletes is not considered cost-effective in the United States due to the rarity of sudden cardiac death and high false-positive rates.
While pre-participation screening with history and physical is universally recommended for young athletes, the addition of routine ECG screening remains controversial in the US due to cost-effectiveness and high false-positive rates.
From the ancient Greek Olympics to the high school gymnasium, competitive sports have become an increasingly important part of human culture. At an early age, children around the world are introduced and encouraged into sports by their parents and peers. For some, playing sports becomes a regular part of life even as they enter adulthood. The medical profession has always been encouraging of physical activity. With the rising obesity epidemic, even the recent Obama administration, spearheaded by First Lady Michelle Obama, started a campaign called “Let’s Move” to promote exercise among our children. Regular physical activity has been shown to improve many markers of health and can ward off diseases fraught with high morbidity and mortality, like diabetes and obesity. However, as the intensity level of sports increases, there remains controversy as to the advantages of certain vigorous forms of exercise. In rare but dramatic circumstances, young athletes can experience sudden cardiac death on the playing field. There are some evidence-based guidelines to help the cardiologist manage the young athlete before they step foot onto the playing field, but major differences exist in different countries as to how this evidence is interpreted and how cost-effectiveness plays a role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagle et al. (2017) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac death in young athletes. Pre-participation screening (ECG, Echocardiogram) was evaluated. Routine pre-participation electrocardiogram screening in young athletes is not considered cost-effective in the United States due to the rarity of sudden cardiac death and high false-positive rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: