Key result
Derived LA diameter from volume matches measured diameter in HCM, yielding an identical 2.4% median SCD risk.
Why the study?
Although left atrial diameter is used in the ESC HCM risk-SCD model, the recommended measure of LA size is left atrial volume, prompting investigation into using LAv instead of LAd.
Can left atrial volume be used to predict left atrial diameter for assessing sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=205)
Can left atrial volume be used to predict left atrial diameter for assessing sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Using left atrial volume to predict left atrial diameter for the ESC risk-SCD model in HCM yields excellent correlation on a population level, but may change risk categorization for a small minority of patients.
LAV-predicted LAd yields equivalent median SCD risk to measured LAd in HCM; leaves open effects of individual recategorization on management.
Background Left atrial diameter (LAd) is included in the European Society for Cardiology's (ESC) risk model for assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but the recommended measure of LA size is left atrial volume (LAv). Hypothesis We hypothesized that LAv could be used instead of LAd in the HCM risk‐SCD model. We aimed to determine the relation between LAd and LAv and to assess the impact of using LAv instead of LAd. Methods Echocardiographic measurements of anteroposterior LAd in the parasternal long‐axis window and LAv from Simpson's biplane method of disks were used. The 5‐year risk of SCD by measured LAd and by LAd predicted from LAv were estimated using the ESC risk‐SCD model. Results In 205 HCM patients (age 56 ± 14 years, 62% male), the relation between LAd and LAv was linear. Median 5‐year risk of SCD was 2.4% (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.6; 3.8) using measured LAd and 2.4% (IQR: 1.6; 3.7) using predicted LAd. The correlation between the SCD risk assessed by measured vs predicted LAd was excellent ( r 2 = 0.96). Use of predicted LAd resulted in four patients (2%) being recategorized between the moderate and high‐risk categories. Conclusions The relation between LAd and LAv was linear with good agreement. On a population level, the correlation between the risk of SCD using measured LAd or LAd predicted from LAv was excellent. On a patient level, using LAd predicted from LAv resulted in the vast majority remaining in the same risk category; however, for a minority of patients, it changed the recommendation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mills et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=205). Left atrial diameter predicted from left atrial volume vs. Measured left atrial diameter was evaluated on Estimated 5-year risk of sudden cardiac death (r2 0.96). Predicting left atrial diameter from left atrial volume for 5-year sudden cardiac death risk assessment in HCM yielded a median risk of 2.4%, identical to measured diameter (r2=0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: