We present an up-to-date compilation of published Hubble constant (H₀) measurements that are independent of the cosmic microwave background sound horizon scale. This compilation is split in two distinct groups: A. Distance ladder measurements sample comprising of 20 recent measurements, primarily from the past four years, utilizing various rung 2 calibrators and rung 3 cosmic distance indicators. B. One-step measurements sample including 33 measurements of H₀ that are independent of both the cosmic microwave background sound horizon scale and the distance ladder approach. These 33 measurements are derived from diverse probes such as cosmic chronometers, gamma-ray attenuation, strong lensing, megamasers etc. Statistical analysis reveals a significant distinction between the two samples. The distance ladder-based sample yields a best fit H₀=72.8±0.5 km s^-1 Mpc^-1 with χ²/d.o.f.=0.51 indicating some correlations. The one-step measurements result in H₀=69.0±0.48 km s^-1 Mpc^-1 with χ²/d.o.f.=1.37 indicating some internal tension. If two outlier measurements are removed (TDCOSMO.I-2019 known to have systematics and MCP-2020), then the best fit of the one-step sample reduces to H₀=68.3±0.5 km s^-1 Mpc^-1 with χ²/d.o.f.=0.95, fully self-consistent and consistent with sound horizon based measurements. An alternative, restricted subsample of the one-step measurements with correlated measurements removed, leads to a best fit H₀=68.5±0.8 km s^-1 Mpc^-1 with χ²/d.o.f.=1.08 demonstrating the robustness of our results. These findings suggest that the core of the Hubble tension lies not between early and late-time measurements, but between distance ladder measurements and all other H₀ determinations. These findings suggest that understanding the origin of the Hubble tension requires careful investigation of both possible systematic effects and potential new physics affecting cosmic distance ladder measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leandros Perivolaropoulos (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: