This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
It is shown that efficiency of cut-off algorithms for nearest neighbour searches depends on the ratio of variance in a lower bound space B to variance in the original space L. The usual choice of a one dimensional B space fails for a high dimensional L space because this ratio is then low. If the dimensionality of B is about half that of L the equivalent of no more than 75% of the full distance computations need be done, independent of the dimensionality of L space. If the variance in B space can be increased by either sorting or the principal components transformation performance is appreciably better.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marimont et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: