PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 30, 2009BMJ161 citations

Ten steps towards improving prognosis research

View Full Paper
HHHarry HemingwayRRRichard D RileyDADouglas G. Altman

Key Points

  • The central aim is to enhance prognosis research methodology in translational medicine for better outcomes.
  • Recommendations proposed by experts in the field to address methodological challenges.
  • Focus on improving systematic review quality and research practices.
  • Identified key areas for methodological enhancement in prognosis research.
  • Proposed actionable steps to ensure stronger conclusions in systematic reviews.

Abstract

Prognosis research should be a basic science in translational medicine, but methodological problems mean systematic reviews are unable to reach firm conclusions. Harry Hemingway and colleagues recommend action to improve the quality

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hemingway et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08eb2134cfc5f8bc5b7b1chttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4184
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Alcohol and coronary heart disease: a meta‐analysis2000 · 886 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews2006 · 1,466 citations
  3. 3Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury2006 · 344 citations
  4. 4Mortality and light to moderate alcohol consumption after myocardial infarction1998 · 179 citations
  5. 5Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences1991 · 579 citations