Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Art exhibition spaces increasingly emphasize visitor experience, yet the relationships among spatial structure, visitor behavior, and emotional response remain unclear. Traditional space syntax analyses typically focus on physical spatial structures, insufficiently capturing visitors’ emotional and cognitive experiences. To address these gaps, this study presents an integrative evaluation framework that combines space syntax theory with multimodal physiological measurements to systematically assess spatial design performance in art exhibition environments. Eye-tracking and heart rate variability (HRV) experiments were conducted to investigate how spatial configuration affects visual attention and emotional responses. Visibility graph analysis, spatial integration metrics, and regression modeling were applied using the third-floor temporary exhibition hall of the Pudong Art Museum in Shanghai as a case study. The results revealed that HRV levels (β = −7.92) were significantly predicted via spatial integration, and the relationship between spatial integration and the number of fixations was partially mediated by HRV (indirect effect: β = −0.36; direct effect: β = 8.23). Additionally, zones with higher occlusivity were associated with more complex scanpaths (mean complexity: 0.14), whereas highly integrated regions triggered more fixations (mean = 10.54) and longer total fixation durations (mean = 2946.98 ms). Therefore, spatial syntax, when coupled with physiological indicators, provides a robust and actionable method for evaluating and optimizing exhibition space design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: