The authors review the status of objective voice quality technology, including four newer techniques being considered by CCITT. Also included are results of applying the four methods to a speech dataset that represents three different languages and a variety of impairments. Data are used to compare and contrast the relative advantages and disadvantages of the assessment techniques. A discussion of problems involving with interpreting results of objective performance tests is presented. Finally, the relative reliability and accuracy of objective and subjective techniques are discussed and compared.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubichek et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: