Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents SqCLIRIL (Spoken Query Cross-lingual Information Retrieval in Indian Languages), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate spoken query-based cross-lingual retrieval across five Indian languages: Hindi, Gujarati, Bengali, Kannada, and English. The task encompasses monolingual and cross-lingual retrieval settings across five language pairs, incorporating spoken queries (male and female voices) and document collections in text. The primary objective is to assess retrieval effectiveness in a low-resource, multilingual setting that reflects real-world language diversity and access constraints. We investigate four retrieval architectures: (i) sparse lexical matching using BM25, (ii) dense semantic retrieval via bi-encoder models, (iii) hybrid ranking through Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) of sparse and dense scores, and (iv) a Large Language Model (LLM)-based pointwise fusion strategy (LPF) that integrates generative semantic alignment. Experimental evaluations on the human-translated TREC DL’19 and DL’20 query sets in the above five languages show that while dense retrieval improves substantially over traditional sparse models, fusion-based approaches—particularly LPF—consistently yield superior nDCG scores across most query-document language pairs. The results underscore the utility of generative AI in enhancing retrieval performance in multilingual, low-resource, speech-centric IR scenarios. This benchmark contributes to developing scalable, speech-first, and language-agnostic retrieval systems, with implications for inclusive information access in linguistically fragmented regions. • Introducing SqCLIRIL: a benchmark for spoken cross-lingual information retrieval in five indian languages. • Evaluation and comparison of CLIR approaches. • LPF achieves consistent gains across monolingual and cross-lingual settings. • Compares gender-based retrieval performance on spoken queries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dave et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: