PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2007European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation77 citations

Intensity versus duration of walking, impact on mortality: the Copenhagen City Heart Study

View Full Paper
PSPeter SchnohrPreventive CardiologyHSHenrik ScharlingUniversity of CopenhagenJJJan Skov JensenCardiac Imaging

Key Result

Fast walking intensity, compared to slow walking, significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality in both women (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.35-0.66) and men (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32-0.59).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=7,308)

Structured PICO

Does walking intensity reduce all-cause mortality in healthy adults?

P
Population
7,308 healthy women and men aged 20-93 from the Copenhagen City Heart Study
I
Intervention
Walking with average or fast relative intensity
C
Comparator
Walking with slow relative intensity
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality over an average of 12 years of follow-uphard clinical

Walking intensity, rather than duration, is strongly inversely associated with all-cause mortality in healthy adults.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.66)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations prescribe that every adult should accumulate 30 min or more of moderate-intensity physical activity in leisure time, preferably all days of the week. To further support these recommendations we examined the impact of walking intensity and walking duration on all-cause mortality. DESIGN: Relative intensity and duration of walking were recorded in 7308 healthy women and men aged 20-93 at the third examination (1991-1994) of the Copenhagen City Heart Study. During an average of 12 years of follow-up 1391 deaths were recorded. RESULTS: For both sexes we found a significant inverse association between walking intensity and risk of death, but only a weak inverse association to walking duration. For women walking with average intensity, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death was 0.75 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.92; P<0.01 and walking with fast intensity 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.66; P<0.001) compared to women walking with slow intensity. For men the relative risks were 0.54 (95% CI 0.45-0.67; P<0.001) and 0.43 (95% CI 0.32-0.59; P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the relative intensity and not the duration of walking is of most importance in relation to all-cause mortality. Thus our general recommendation to all adults would be that brisk walking is preferable to slow.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schnohr et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Healthy adults (n=7,308). Walking intensity (average or fast) vs. Slow walking intensity was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.66, p=<0.001). Fast walking intensity, compared to slow walking, significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality in both women (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.35-0.66) and men (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32-0.59).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0906b562c780efd627fb9ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/hjr.0b013e3280144470
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper