Why the study?
Sprint interval training increases peak oxygen uptake, but prior exploratory findings suggested peak cardiac output may increase only in males, prompting examination of the potential influence of biological sex.
Does biological sex influence the peak cardiac output response to 12 weeks of sprint interval training?
Does biological sex influence the peak cardiac output response to 12 weeks of sprint interval training?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Twelve weeks of sprint interval training increases peak oxygen uptake without changing peak cardiac output, and this response is not influenced by biological sex.
Sprint interval training (SIT) increases peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ) but the mechanistic basis is unclear. We have reported that 12 wk of SIT increased V̇O 2peak and peak cardiac output (Q̇ peak ) and the changes in these variables were correlated. An exploratory analysis suggested that Q̇ peak increased in males but not females. The present study incorporated best practices to examine the potential influence of biological sex on the Q̇ peak response to SIT. Male and female participants (n = 10 each; 21 ± 4 y) performed 33 ± 2 sessions of SIT over 12 wk. Each 10-min session involved 3 × 20-s ‘all-out’ sprints on an ergometer. V̇O 2peak increased after SIT (3.16 ± 1.0 vs. 2.89 ± 1.0 L/min, η 2 p = 0.53, p < 0.001) with no sex × time interaction ( p = 0.61). Q̇ peak was unchanged after training (15.2 ± 3.3 vs. 15.1 ± 3.0 L/min, p = 0.85), in contrast to our previous study. The peak estimated arteriovenous oxygen difference increased after training (204 ± 30 vs. 187 ± 36 ml/L, p = 0.006). There was no effect of training or sex on measures of endothelial function. We conclude that 12 wk of SIT increases V̇O 2peak but the mechanistic basis remains unclear. The capacity of inert gas rebreathing to assess changes in Q̇ peak may be limited and invasive studies that use more direct measures are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bostad et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: