PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 18, 2014EP Europace177 citationsOpen Access

B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in the prediction of atrial fibrillation risk: the CHARGE-AF Consortium of community-based cohort studies

View Full Paper
MSMoritz F. SinnerKSKatherine A. StepasCMCarlee Moser

Key Result

B-type natriuretic peptide significantly predicted atrial fibrillation (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.56-1.76; P<0.0001) and improved the C-statistic of a clinical risk score from 0.765 to 0.790.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=26,226)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the addition of BNP or CRP improve the prediction of atrial fibrillation incidence in community-based cohorts?

P
Population
18,556 Whites and African Americans from three US community-based cohorts (ARIC n=10,675, CHS n=5,043, FHS n=2,838), with replication in two independent European cohorts (AGES n=4,467, RS n=3,203).
I
Intervention
Addition of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP or NT-proBNP) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) to a previously reported clinical atrial fibrillation risk score
C
Comparator
Previously reported clinical atrial fibrillation risk score alone
O
Outcome
Atrial fibrillation incidence over a 5-year prediction horizonhard clinical

B-type natriuretic peptide, but not C-reactive protein, substantially improves the prediction of atrial fibrillation risk beyond standard clinical factors in community-based populations.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.66 (95% CI 1.56-1.76)

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

AIMS: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict atrial fibrillation (AF) risk. However, their risk stratification abilities in the broad community remain uncertain. We sought to improve risk stratification for AF using biomarker information. METHODS AND RESULTS: We ascertained AF incidence in 18 556 Whites and African Americans from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC, n=10 675), Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS, n = 5043), and Framingham Heart Study (FHS, n = 2838), followed for 5 years (prediction horizon). We added BNP (ARIC/CHS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; FHS: BNP), CRP, or both to a previously reported AF risk score, and assessed model calibration and predictive ability C-statistic, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI). We replicated models in two independent European cohorts: Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility Reykjavik Study (AGES), n = 4467; Rotterdam Study (RS), n = 3203. B-type natriuretic peptide and CRP were significantly associated with AF incidence (n = 1186): hazard ratio per 1-SD ln-transformed biomarker 1.66 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-1.76, P < 0.0001 and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.11-1.25), P < 0.0001, respectively. Model calibration was sufficient (BNP, χ(2) = 17.0; CRP, χ(2) = 10.5; BNP and CRP, χ(2) = 13.1). B-type natriuretic peptide improved the C-statistic from 0.765 to 0.790, yielded an IDI of 0.027 (95% CI, 0.022-0.032), a relative IDI of 41.5%, and a continuous NRI of 0.389 (95% CI, 0.322-0.455). The predictive ability of CRP was limited (C-statistic increment 0.003). B-type natriuretic peptide consistently improved prediction in AGES and RS. CONCLUSION: B-type natriuretic peptide, not CRP, substantially improved AF risk prediction beyond clinical factors in an independently replicated, heterogeneous population. B-type natriuretic peptide may serve as a benchmark to evaluate novel putative AF risk biomarkers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sinner et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation risk (n=26,226). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) vs. Clinical factors alone (previously reported AF risk score) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation incidence (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.56-1.76, p=<0.0001). B-type natriuretic peptide significantly predicted atrial fibrillation (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.56-1.76; P<0.0001) and improved the C-statistic of a clinical risk score from 0.765 to 0.790.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09078f62c780efd627fc83https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1B‐type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care2012 · 29 citations
  2. 2Inflammation as a Risk Factor for Atrial Fibrillation2003 · 1,438 citations
  3. 3Simple Risk Model Predicts Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in a Racially and Geographically Diverse Population: the CHARGE‐AF Consortium2013 · 901 citations
  4. 4Role of inflammation in early atrial fibrillation recurrence2012 · 98 citations
  5. 5Comparison of BNP and NT-proBNP assays in the approach to the emergency diagnosis of acute dyspnea2006 · 30 citations